2023
By the time spring started I hadn’t worked for four months. There’d been a short gig in December but prior to that, nothing since June. The agency I contract with slows down in the summer as their primary client Microsoft slows down too, having run so hard for so long they just need a break. It normally picks up in the fall but that year the economy teetered, ChatGPT appeared, big tech companies issued mass layoffs, yet everyone claimed the layoffs and ChatGPT release were unrelated. For the first time it looked like technology could replace white collar workers, even artists.
Looking back I kind of freaked out, judging by my writing and frenetic behavior. I was set on this idea I could write for The Atlantic, for example. That could be my ticket out. Or that I could become fluent in AI if I just read enough books and white papers. So I consumed every bit of news and information I could, even fancied myself a kind of machine. I actually corrected a guy online about the difference between foundational and NLP models (and I was right). Worst of all, I read a book about existential threats to humanity and got sucked into the singularity, the AGI debate. A dark place of eyeless creatures. I got a virtual ticket to see the technologist Geoffrey Hinton give his first talk after leaving Google on grounds he was concerned for the fate of humanity (Hinton, one of the three “godfathers of AI”). In the end I understood very little and worried quite a lot.
I wrote my AI manifesto and nobody gave a damn. I found an AI mentor on Vashon Island and ferried over on Saturdays to talk shop. He was older and worked in tech, a coder geek, long ponytail, thinning hair. Sober 40 years. Lived alone and built analogue synthesizer systems with complex wiring and displays of twinkling lights and sounds, indefinite loop. He said you really don’t need to worry about ChatGPT being sentient, there’s no “there” there. And then he gave me some sources I could trust in the untrustworthy Silicon Valley.
In May I got more work again, to write sales decks for Microsoft on generative AI. How it could help replace people in call centers (without saying that), how it could help white collar workers save time. I used the tech myself to fill in content gaps on slides or to summarize transcripts. It worked perfectly.
In the last two years the AI narrative has shifted from generative to agentic AI and now everyone is trying to untangle what’s meant by agents and what it will mean for people. I’m actually getting paid to do that right now, to market agents: the spectrum of agents, from task retrieval to semi- or fully autonomous. I started down the path of building my own agents but didn’t have anything for them to do other than generate content but the thing is, I like generating content. It’s one of the things I like about being human.
I got a gig ghostwriting for Microsoft, a series on how generative and agentic AI could help retail executives. I used Copilot to help me write one of the blogs and yes, it saved time but no, I’m not proud of the output. By contrast, I labored my way through the last blog and it’s my best.
I think we often use tech to help remove friction or inconveniences but there are times the friction yields a better result. My work (content marketing) is on the chopping block. Could there really be a utopic future where people don’t need to work and use machines to serve them? Is that a real utopia?
Categories: Corporate America, Technology

I am still firmly in the anti-AI camp, particularly when it comes to works of artistic creation. And while, it is early days so far, when I come across AI in the wild, I’m never impressed.
Regarding the first, I’m in a local writing group. Once a month we get together for lunch and to talk about our writing lives. The last two months, there have been casual references by members that they are using AI for various aspects of their projects. And … the group is putting together a conference for the FAll. One of the sessions will be about “Using AI Tools,” and I just want to run screaming from the building.
Meanwhile, out in the wild … nearby fast food restaurants are moving towards AI for the drive-thru. I went through one last week. It was not exactly a speedy experience.
And regarding your last question … no, it is not Utopic. It is hell. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah I get that, the anti-AI camp. I’ve embraced it and geeked out on it quite a bit. I did use AI to help give me feedback on a draft story (10k words if I recall right) and was surprised by how good the feedback was; for example it suggested reordering a scene for greater emphasis which I thought was pretty insightful and good feedback. I have hope, but because it’s human-built it will be deeply flawed on many orders of magnitude.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Friction yields a better result.” You’re right! I’m thinking of how bodies become weak without gravity. Do our brains weaken when they no longer strive to create?
LikeLiked by 3 people
I was thinking that too with the atrophy bit! The movie Wall-E was prescient like that…
LikeLiked by 1 person
A: Utopia making it’s not likely to be, IMHO.
We (so called humanity) seem to be terribly prone to creating successive catastrophes that we must combat to make our way through; not always unscathed. AI looks set to give us a run for our money. But:
~
It’s good to see you emerge from agentic purgatory and rise like a halo floating above AGI.
~
Be well and do good, Bill.
Kind regards
DD
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha ha, jam-packed with deft references here, you…thank you DD, agreed on the humanity front.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although not sentient, I’m drawn to the idea of holding AI legally accountable for aiding and abetting crimes.
LikeLiked by 1 person